Lemoigne®
Back to News
InsightBanking & Finance

Operational resilience and third parties: what ADI boards are asking in 2026 reviews

5 February 2026
Lemoigne®
Operational resilience and third parties: what ADI boards are asking in 2026 reviews
APRA’s expectations on operational risk and service providers continue to sharpen. Boards want evidence—not slide decks—that critical services can withstand disruption and that outsourcing governance is live.

Authorised deposit-taking institutions are well past the “tick the CPS box” phase for CPS 230-style themes: service provider management, business continuity, and incident response are now board-visible metrics. Examiners and internal audit alike are asking for traceability from material service arrangements to actual testing outcomes.

Foreign-backed ADIs in particular face the complexity of global parent standards mapped onto Australian prudential language. The task is not double compliance; it is a coherent narrative that satisfies APRA without fighting your home regulator’s framework.

Whether you are preparing for a deep dive or a routine CPS 220/230 cycle, the firms that fare best treat third-party risk as an operating rhythm—owners, dashboards, and escalation paths—rather than an annual policy refresh.

#APRA#ADI#operational risk#CPS 230